Arguments in Akbar’s the Great

Arguments in Akbar’s the Great Akbar was living in the mid 1500’s and the early 1600’s. Akbar lived in india. Akbar was only 14 years of age when he took over the throne and surpassed his father. 1564 was the year that akbar was almost assassinated and killed buy a bullet. The bullet did not kill him it only struck his shoulder and Akbar lived. Shortly after this Akbar the Great took the reigns of the mughal empire and he took over the empire. A anti mughal coalistin that was maniley a bunch of afghanis tried to pull of something out of the ordinary, They tried to recapture the throne, it didn’t turn out that well because they loses the battle against the Mughals, The mughals are akbar’s empire.Akbar was an ambitos and noble commander. Akbar built one of the biggest armies known to the mughal empire. One barrier that akbar happen to come across was the afghanis in india. The afghanis where one of the most dangerous to the mughal empire.Akbar declared his intentions to reclaim the rights to the throne at the delhi. The huge mughal empire moved to panipat to conquer and the Mughals faced hemu’s. One of the biggest problem here is that hemu’s army was giant. Even bigger than the Mughals. Even 3x larger than it. It was almost impossible for the mughals to defeat hemu’s army. So Akbar’s hope for the throne is almost gone at this point. But the Mughals army was smarter than hemu’s because the mughals struck the leader of the hemu’s. When a empire or an army doesn’t have a leader they don’t know what they do so they surrendered and akbar took over the throne again. Thesis Akbar was an Agent of change because he was so powerful he extended his empire at 14 years of age, he revised the tax system and he was religiously open minded . Argument 1 Evidence 1 Akbar ruled through cooperation and tolerance. Akbar did not make any of the hindu population/ people convert to islam if they didn’t want to. Akbar also was able to translate hindi literature he was very welcoming of other religions as he was a very curious person. Argument 1 Evidence 2 Akbar the great was a fabulous general and he extended on his military development throughout his reign when akbar died his empire continued Argument 1 Evidence 3 In creation of his empire akbar had a lot of success because of that he created his empire and as a result of that he was able to earn trust and loyalty from the people who conquered him and then Akbar conquered them. Argument 2 Evidence 1 He inherited small fiefs but he was able to achieve stability, and over time he won control of northern india and the afghanis. By the time he dies he ruled from afghanistan to sindu. He was able to do that because he was a great and smart ruler who a lot of people respected. By his strategies to conquer and expand Argument 2 Evidence 2 Akbar the Great revised the tax system in 1574. When Akbar did this he separated the revenue collection from the military administration. Who was in charge of this stuff, you might ask? Well each subban or governor was to maintain order in his region. While all of this was going on a separate tax collector collected these property taxes and sent them to the capital. Argument 2 Evidence 3 The Stuff in evidence 2 supports this. That created checks and balances. In regions they didn’t have much money so the people otherwise known as the individuals, they had no troops. But the troops had no money, the troops and the individuals were dependent on the main source†¦ The central government. What the central government did was they doled out fixed salaries to both the military and civilian personnel according to rank. Argument 3 Evidence 1 Akbar was a really religious guy. He went to a lot of religious festivals even when it wasn’t even his own religion. Akbar built a temple in this certain temple he hosted scholars, they came from different religions. Those religions included hindus, zoroastrians, christians, yogis, and muslims of other sects. He allowed the jesuits to confront a church at agra. Argument 3 evidence 2 Not everybody really thought that the Temple was a good idea. They thought that multiculturalism wasn’t a good idea. Akbar was called a â€Å"heretic†. Mid way 1579 a mazer or declaration was issued that granted Akbar The Great the authority to interpret religious law, superseding the authority of the mullahs. This became known as the infallibility decree, and it furthered akbar’s ability to create an interreligious and multi cultural state. Argument 3 evidence 3 In 1582 Akbar had established a new cult, a cult is (a relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister.) But this wasn’t really a small group it was relatively large. The Din-i-ilahi, or otherwise known as ‘Divine faith†, that combined a bunch of elements of a bunch of different religions, that also included islam, hinduism and the zoroastrianism. What this faith did was it centered around Akbar The Great as a prophet or a spiritual leader. This faith Died when Akbar died.